Ukraine Foundation: An Independent Research and Impact Organization for Ukraine

Inspiring Change, Driving Impact

As a research-focused organization it focuses on peace processes and conflict resolution within the context of the war in Ukraine.

As an impact-driven organization it is committed to transforming lives and communities by fostering creativity, unleashing innovation, and strengthening cooperation across diverse fields.

The discussion turns to recent political developments involving UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer and their potential implications for British governance, domestic political stability, and the United Kingdom’s role in European affairs.

Reflecting on both topics, Dr. Heletiy observes that they illustrate a broader challenge confronting Europe: reconciling immediate political pressures with long-term strategic objectives at a time of heightened geopolitical uncertainty.

Ukraine Foundation congratulates Dr. Heletiy on her continued engagement with leading public broadcasters and her contribution to informed discussion on the policy issues shaping Ukraine’s European future and the wider security and political landscape.

A central theme of the interview is Louis Voiron’s argument that reflexive control, not disinformation alone, has been the decisive instrument shaping Western decision-making since 2022. Where information operations distort what people believe, he explains, reflexive control is designed to shape how adversaries decide even when they hold accurate information. He points to Russia’s use of nuclear signaling and strategic ambiguity — from statements by senior officials to the deployment of dual-capable missile systems — as tools calibrated to constrain U.S. and European policy choices and keep Western assistance to Ukraine incremental rather than decisive.

Looking ahead, Louis L. Voiron outlines a range of scenarios for how the conflict might evolve, from a U.S.-mediated pause to a longer-term, Korean-style frozen conflict. He argues that any settlement lacking credible security guarantees and durable political commitments risks giving Russia the opportunity to regenerate its military capacity. He also flags the Baltic region — and the Suwałki Corridor in particular — as the most likely site of a future flashpoint should the conflict expand westward, precisely because such a scenario would align with Russia’s reflexive-control doctrine and test NATO cohesion directly.

The interview devotes significant attention to the strategic logic of continued U.S. and European engagement. Louis Voiron discusses the 2025 U.S.–Ukraine critical minerals agreement as an early example of a broader shift toward shared economic interests, not just shared values, and argues that Ukraine’s defense-industrial base, innovation ecosystem, and critical minerals sector position the country to become a meaningful contributor to transatlantic supply chains and security cooperation. He also stresses that Europe must take fuller ownership of its own deterrence — financially, industrially, and technologically — rather than relying on the United States by default.

Louis Voiron frames Ukraine’s reconstruction not merely as the physical rebuilding of damaged infrastructure, but as a strategic process of economic modernization, institutional strengthening, and technological integration spanning critical minerals, advanced manufacturing, defense technology, aerospace, cybersecurity, artificial intelligence, and energy resilience. He also highlights the value of Track 2 diplomacy and pilot projects — citing the protection of critical infrastructure such as nuclear power plants and water systems as one area where Switzerland, home to Ukraine Foundation’s Geneva office, could play a constructive role.

Asked about the Foundation’s current work, Louis L. Voiron described three interconnected priorities: supporting Ukraine’s resilience and international engagement through policy programs and structured bilateral dialogue; developing co-development projects with institutional investors and defense-technology innovators to strengthen Ukraine’s long-term economic and technological potential; and applying the Foundation’s experience in international negotiations and Track 2 diplomacy to support a fair and durable settlement. Taken together, he said, these efforts are meant to help anchor Ukraine within a stable, secure, and prosperous European and transatlantic future.

The interview reflects Ukraine Foundation’s mission to contribute to informed international dialogue on Ukraine’s security, democratic development, economic recovery, and global partnerships. By fostering evidence-based analysis and interdisciplinary research, the Foundation seeks to support policymakers, practitioners, researchers, and private-sector leaders engaged in shaping Ukraine’s long-term resilience and integration within the Euro-Atlantic community.

Ukraine Foundation extends its sincere appreciation to Professor Valentin Yakushik and the editorial team of Ukrainian Policymaker for facilitating this thoughtful and substantive exchange.

Bringing together governmental and non-governmental stakeholders, the forum highlighted the growing recognition that the security of the Black Sea region is inseparable from the security of Europe as a whole. Alex Luna’s presence at the conference reflected Ukraine Foundation’s commitment to supporting international dialogue on resilience, security, and Ukraine’s role in shaping the future of the wider European region.

The interview focused on a reality often overlooked in discussions about the war. While public attention frequently centers on the occupied Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant, Ukraine’s nuclear security challenge extends far beyond a single facility. According to Tyshchenko, Russia’s long-range strike capabilities have effectively eliminated any notion of a safe geographic rear area. All four of Ukraine’s nuclear power plants remain vulnerable to attack.

Nuclear Security Is a European Security Issue

One of the key themes of the discussion was the inseparability of Ukrainian and European nuclear security. A major incident at any Ukrainian nuclear facility would not be confined by national borders. The consequences would affect neighboring countries, regional energy security, and public confidence across Europe.

Tyshchenko emphasized that modern nuclear infrastructure was designed to withstand accidents and technical failures—not sustained military attacks involving missiles, drones, and long-range precision weapons. The damage inflicted on the New Safe Confinement structure at Chornobyl illustrates this challenge. Built to safely isolate the destroyed reactor for generations, the structure was never intended to serve as a fortress against military strikes.

The lesson is significant. Nuclear safety standards developed in peacetime are now being tested in conditions for which they were never designed.

The Zaporizhzhia Challenge

The Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant remains the most visible symbol of the risks created by the war. Although all six reactors are currently shut down, the facility continues to require stable external power supplies to maintain cooling and essential safety systems. Repeated disruptions to these power connections remain a source of concern.

Tyshchenko noted that a failure of backup systems would not necessarily result in a repeat of the 1986 Chornobyl disaster. However, he warned that a severe accident could still create an environmental catastrophe whose consequences would be felt for decades and potentially extend beyond Ukraine’s borders. The exact impact would depend on meteorological conditions and the nature of the incident.

The discussion also addressed proposals occasionally advanced regarding international administration of the facility. Tyshchenko argued that the technical management of the plant is not the primary obstacle. The fundamental question is security: who can guarantee the safety of personnel operating a nuclear facility while one party to the conflict continues to conduct military operations against Ukrainian infrastructure? 

Nuclear Facilities as Instruments of Psychological Pressure

A particularly important aspect of the interview concerned Russia’s use of nuclear-related incidents as instruments of strategic signaling and psychological pressure.

Tyshchenko described attacks associated with the Chornobyl exclusion zone as acts of psychological terrorism intended to exploit the enduring emotional impact of the 1986 disaster. Any incident involving Chornobyl immediately attracts international attention and generates public anxiety far beyond Ukraine’s borders. According to his assessment, this effect is not incidental but forms part of a broader strategy aimed at shaping perceptions and influencing international responses.

This observation reflects a wider trend visible throughout the war: critical infrastructure is targeted not only for its operational value but also for its psychological and political impact.

Resilience Under Continuous Threat

The interview also addressed Ukraine’s preparedness for radiological and nuclear contingencies. Tyshchenko cautioned against unrealistic expectations. No large European country can be fully protected against a nuclear attack or entirely shield its population from such risks. Nevertheless, Ukraine has accumulated practical experience in protecting and operating nuclear infrastructure under conditions of sustained military pressure.

This experience is unprecedented in modern Europe. For more than four years, Ukrainian authorities, operators, and emergency services have had to manage nuclear facilities while facing regular missile and drone attacks from one of the world’s largest military powers.

Lessons for Europe

The broader lesson emerging from Tyshchenko’s assessment is that the war in Ukraine has fundamentally altered assumptions about nuclear security. Traditional safety models were built around technical failures, natural disasters, and industrial accidents. They were not designed around the deliberate targeting of nuclear-related infrastructure during a major interstate conflict.

As Europe debates energy security, resilience, and defense preparedness, Ukraine’s experience demonstrates that nuclear security can no longer be treated as a purely technical matter. It has become an integral component of national security, critical infrastructure protection, and strategic deterrence.

The risks facing Ukraine’s nuclear sector are therefore not solely Ukrainian risks. They are a warning about the vulnerabilities that modern societies must address in an era where military, technological, and psychological dimensions of conflict increasingly overlap.

As moderator and host, Alex Luna guided a thoughtful discussion with Ambassador Taylor on the evolving geopolitical landscape, the enduring importance of transatlantic cooperation, and the challenges and opportunities facing Ukraine as it continues to defend its sovereignty and pursue its Euro-Atlantic future.

Ambassador Taylor, one of the United States’ most respected diplomats and long-standing advocates for Ukraine, offered valuable insights drawn from decades of experience in diplomacy, security policy, and U.S.-Ukraine relations. The discussion underscored the strategic importance of sustained international engagement and highlighted the resilience demonstrated by the Ukrainian people in the face of ongoing aggression.

For Ukraine Foundation, the event reflected the organization’s broader commitment to strengthening international partnerships, advancing informed public discourse, and creating opportunities for constructive engagement between policymakers, experts, civil society leaders, and the Ukrainian diaspora. Through initiatives such as this, the Foundation seeks to contribute to a deeper understanding of Ukraine’s strategic importance and the global implications of the war.

Alex Luna’s leadership in convening conversations of this caliber continues to demonstrate the important role that cultural and public diplomacy play in strengthening Ukraine’s international presence. As Vice President for Cultural Diplomacy, he has consistently worked to build bridges between Ukraine and its international partners through dialogue, advocacy, and cultural engagement.

Ukraine Foundation extends its sincere gratitude to Ambassador William Taylor for his participation and to Ukraine House for providing a distinguished venue that continues to serve as a focal point for the Ukrainian community and its friends in Washington.

Kyiv: Ukraine Foundation Fellows Publish Four New Articles with the Peer-Reviewed Ukrainian Policymaker Journal

We Are Team UA: Voices of Experience Informing Ukraine Future

Kyiv: Ukraine Foundation Fellows Publish with the Institute of World History of the Academy of Sciences of Ukraine

Brussels: Ukraine Foundation’s Alex Luna Appointed Advisor to Ukraine’s Human Rights Commissioner Dmytro Lubinets

We Are Team UA: Voices of Impact

We Are Team UA: Leadership with Purpose

Lviv: Ukraine Foundation’s Vice President for Cultural Diplomacy Alex Luna Leads the National Anthem Before the Final of the 2025 Ukrainian Football Cup.

In “The Balkans Model and Conditions for Peace in Ukraine,” Dr. Heletiy draws on the experience of the Balkan conflicts to analyze the irregular warfare nature of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and what it means for peace-building. Her analysis offers a sobering but necessary perspective: that peace in Ukraine cannot be built on traditional negotiations alone.

Using the backdrop of Russia’s repeated violations of ceasefire agreements -most recently its broken “Easter truce”- Dr. Heletiy argues that today’s hybrid conflicts require more than diplomatic handshakes. The war in Ukraine spans far beyond the battlefield, touching diplomatic, informational, economic, humanitarian, and military fronts. As she points out, ceasefires in irregular conflicts often serve less as a path to peace and more as a pause for regrouping and rearming.

Drawing lessons from the Balkans, Dr. Heletiy proposes that irregular warfare tools -such as economic pressure, information campaigns, and unconventional tactics- must be part of any comprehensive strategy for sustainable peace. Her article warns against the false comfort of conventional approaches that do not account for the ideological drivers, asymmetries, and non-state actors that continue to shape today’s conflicts.

We encourage everyone interested in peace and security in Ukraine and beyond to read Dr. Heletiy’s full piece, which brings deep insight and strategic clarity to one of the most pressing issues of our time.

A Message from Louis L. Voiron

Founding President

“Ukraine Foundation is a research-focused and impact-driven organization at its core.”

At Ukraine Foundation, we believe that Ukraine’s path to peace, resilience, and prosperity depends on more than simply enduring the challenges of today—it requires shaping the future with vision, determination, and global solidarity.

Every initiative we lead is rooted in the conviction that Ukraine’s strength lies not only in its courage, but also in its ability to inspire partnerships, drive innovation, and share its cultural and intellectual contributions with the world. Whether advancing groundbreaking policy research, fostering cross-border dialogue, or mobilizing resources for humanitarian and development projects, our mission is clear: to turn shared values into lasting impact.

This is a time when the stakes could not be higher. Ukraine’s future is inseparable from the future of the international community, and the choices we make today will define generations to come. That is why Ukraine Foundation works at the intersection of policy, culture, and technology—bridging sectors, uniting allies and partners, and building solutions that outlast crises.

To our friends, partners, and supporters around the globe: thank you for standing with Ukraine. Together, we can transform resolve into results, hope into action, and vision into a future where peace and progress prevail.

Kyiv: Alex Luna Honored with a Certificate of Appreciation by the Speaker of the Ukrainian Parliament, Ruslan Stefanchuk.